Hidden translation costs in cell and gene therapy manufacturing

Cell and Gene Therapy Insights 2026; 12(8), 831–842

10.18609/cgti.2026.102

Published: 10 September
Review
Robert E Nordon

Ex vivo cell and gene therapies have demonstrated remarkable clinical efficacy, yet their widespread adoption remains constrained by the complexity and cost of translation and manufacture. Current development commonly progresses through different equipment architectures: standard tissue-culture systems for process development, integrated patient-scale systems for early clinical manufacture, and factory-integrated systems for high-volume commercial production. Each transition can require process re-optimization, comparability, validation, and technology transfer. This review examines emerging manufacturing technologies and system architectures from a systems-engineering perspective. Drawing on Quality by Design, it proposes Design for Translation (DfT) as a future equipment R&D objective: to develop closed and automated platforms that support multiplexed process development while allowing the same validated unit operation to be replicated for clinical manufacture and commercial scale-out. By preserving the relevant cell microenvironment, critical process parameters, control logic and, digital records throughout the product lifecycle, DfT seeks to reduce platform-change costs and improve the affordability and accessibility of ex vivo cell and gene therapies.

What you will learn
01
Why platform changes across process development, clinical manufacture, and commercial scale-out create hidden translational costs beyond cost of goods, including re-optimization, comparability, validation, and technology transfer
02
How Design for Translation (DfT) proposes closed, automated equipment that is multiplexed for process development and replicated, rather than redesigned, for clinical and commercial manufacture
03
How modular, integrated patient-manufacturing, and factory-integrated system architectures compare in flexibility, standardization, and capacity, and where each is best suited across the translational pathway
Key interests
Manufacturing scale-up/scale-out
Design for Translation
CAR-T manufacturing
Bioreactor technology
Process automation
Technology transfer
Quality by Design
Autologous cell therapy